Alex Hunsaker wrote: > A big part of my problem with the split is if there is a discussion > taking place on -hackers I want to be able to reply to the discussion > and say "well, here is what I was thinking". Sending it to -patches > first waiting for it to hit the archive so I can link to it in my > reply on -hackers seems pointless and convoluted.
Yea, that is a problem. Adding a new patch to patches while discussing on hackers is a receipe for confusion. > But if thats what you want, thats what ill try to do from now on :) > > For instance the patch Tom reviewed of mine yesterday only -hackers > was copied, so I maintained that but also added -patches because I was > sending in a patch... Yea, sending to both is probably the worst. I would just post to hackers and mention you sent a new version of the patch to patches --- they usually show up the same time. > I think It will be an ongoing problem though especially for new people > as they probably wont understand the "logical" split... Yep, I can hardly explain it. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
