On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:20:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Matthew T. O'connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Patches are an integral part of the conversation about > > development, I think trying to split them up is awkward at best. > > Do people really still think that the potential for larger > > messages is really a problem? > > Personally I'd be fine with abandoning -patches and just using > -hackers. We could try it for awhile, anyway, and go back if it > seems worse.
This would make it a little tougher on me as far as maintaining the patches section of the PostgreSQL Weekly News, but I'll deal with it if I need to :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
