On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 15:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> CVS HEAD w/patch savings
>
> pg_database_size('postgres') 4439752 4071112 8.3%
> pg_relation_size('pg_class_relname_nsp_index') 57344 40960
> 28%
> pg_relation_size('pg_proc_proname_args_nsp_index') 319488 204800 35%
>
> Cutting a third off the size of a system index has got to be worth
> something, but is it worth a hack as ugly as this one?
Not doing it would be more ugly, unless there is some negative
side-effect?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
