Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane napsal(a): >> Cutting a third off the size of a system index has got to be worth >> something, but is it worth a hack as ugly as this one?
> The problem what I see there is how to fit with in-place-upgrade. Catalog > should > be generate from scratch, but if somebody uses name in regular table it > invokes > request for reindex. Actually, an existing index stored as "name" would continue to work fine, so I think this could be worked around. But in any case name is deprecated for user use, so anyone who suffers a reindex has only themselves to blame. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers