Tom Lane wrote: > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Could autovacuum emit log messages as soon as it sees such tables and start > > dropping them at some point later? > > We might have to rearrange the logic a bit to make that happen (I'm not > sure what order things get tested in), but a log message does seem like > a good idea. I'd go for logging anytime an orphaned table is seen, > and dropping once it's past the anti-wraparound horizon.
I don't think this requires much of a rearrangement -- see autovacuum.c 1921ff. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
