Tom Lane writes:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
We might have to rearrange the logic a bit to make that happen
(I'm not
sure what order things get tested in), but a log message does seem
like
a good idea. I'd go for logging anytime an orphaned table is seen,
and dropping once it's past the anti-wraparound horizon.
I don't think this requires much of a rearrangement -- see
autovacuum.c
1921ff.
So everyone is happy with the concept of doing it as above? If so,
I'll work on it this weekend sometime.
I think it is the most reasonable thing to do. Regarding the log
messages about orphaned tables, it would be nice if you could add a
hint/detail message explaining how to cleanup those tables. If that's
possible.
Best Regards
Michael Paesold
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
