Tom Lane writes:

Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
We might have to rearrange the logic a bit to make that happen (I'm not sure what order things get tested in), but a log message does seem like
a good idea.  I'd go for logging anytime an orphaned table is seen,
and dropping once it's past the anti-wraparound horizon.

I don't think this requires much of a rearrangement -- see autovacuum.c
1921ff.

So everyone is happy with the concept of doing it as above?  If so,
I'll work on it this weekend sometime.

I think it is the most reasonable thing to do. Regarding the log messages about orphaned tables, it would be nice if you could add a hint/detail message explaining how to cleanup those tables. If that's possible.

Best Regards
Michael Paesold

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to