Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 11:17 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I think doing the WAL streaming and allowing a read-only slave is > > enough work to keep Simon busy for quite some time. I don't > > understand why the logical issue is being discussed at this stage --- > > let's get the other stuff done first. > > I'm not working on WAL streaming. My plans assume someone else is and > I'll be as worried as you if the current answer is "nobody".
Oh, OK, good. I was unclear on that. NTT is working with EnterpriseDB on the WAL steaming code to be released to the community. > I expect to be involved in reviewing it fairly closely though... Yes, of course. > Other than that, my time is limited only by how much funding I have. Or > put another way, the constraining factor is money, not available time. That is good, I think. ;-) -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
