> The objection comes down to this: it's an extremely large, invasive, > and probably performance-losing patch, which apparently will be of use > to only a rather small set of people. It's not unreasonable to discuss > just how large that set might be while we debate whether to accept the > patch.
Significant loss of performance for people who are not using the feature seems like it ought to be considered a non-starter. "Not using MAC" needs to be a fast-path. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
