Robert Haas wrote: > > The objection comes down to this: it's an extremely large, invasive, > > and probably performance-losing patch, which apparently will be of use > > to only a rather small set of people. It's not unreasonable to discuss > > just how large that set might be while we debate whether to accept the > > patch. > > Significant loss of performance for people who are not using the > feature seems like it ought to be considered a non-starter. "Not > using MAC" needs to be a fast-path.
Right now all of SE-PostgreSQL is a compile-time option so I assume the slowdown is only for compile-enabled builds. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
