Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Hmm, I'll bet the restore code doesn't realize that this can't run in >> parallel with index creation on either table ...
> Yeah. Of course, it's never needed to bother with stuff like that till now. > The very simple fix is probably to run a separate parallel cycle just > for FKs, after the index creation. Um, FKs could conflict with each other too, so that by itself isn't gonna fix anything. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers