Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm, I'll bet the restore code doesn't realize that this can't run in
>> parallel with index creation on either table ...

> Yeah. Of course, it's never needed to bother with stuff like that till now.

> The very simple fix is probably to run a separate parallel cycle just 
> for FKs, after the index creation.

Um, FKs could conflict with each other too, so that by itself isn't
gonna fix anything.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to