Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Hmm, I'll bet the restore code doesn't realize that this can't run in
parallel with index creation on either table ...
Yeah. Of course, it's never needed to bother with stuff like that till now.
The very simple fix is probably to run a separate parallel cycle just
for FKs, after the index creation.
Um, FKs could conflict with each other too, so that by itself isn't
gonna fix anything.
Good point. Looks like we'll need to make a list of "can't run in
parallel with" items as well as strict dependencies.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
