Tom Lane wrote:
>[ redirected to pgsql-hackers for comment ]
>
>Helge Bahmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> There is a more complete version of this capability in the Debian patch
>>> set. I think we've been waiting for Oliver to pull it out and submit it
>>> as a patch...
>
>> Ok found it; uses "peer" as a keyword instead of "ident" but basically
>> does the same thing. I think you can discard my patch then.
>
>Well, we need to talk about that. I like your idea of making ident auth
>"just work" on local connections better than Oliver's approach of
>inventing a separate auth-type keyword. So some kind of merger of the
>two patches seems attractive to me. But Oliver may feel that he has to
>continue to support the "peer" keyword on Debian anyway, for backwards
>compatibility. If so, do we want different ways of doing the same thing
>on different distros, or should we just follow the Debian precedent to
>keep things ugly-but-consistent?
This change has only been made in the unstable release; so I don't mind
if peer and ident are folded together. Anyone running unstable knows
the world may turn upside down beneath him!
So if you have a patch to do that, go ahead.
--
Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good
courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed; for
the LORD thy God is with thee whithersoever thou
goest." Joshua 1:9
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
