Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> ... But Oliver may feel that he has to >> continue to support the "peer" keyword on Debian anyway, for backwards >> compatibility. If so, do we want different ways of doing the same thing >> on different distros, or should we just follow the Debian precedent to >> keep things ugly-but-consistent? > We could easily just accept peer as a synonym for ident for a few > releases, Or let Oliver patch the Debian package to accept peer as a synonym for ident. I don't see any real need to encourage the use of that keyword by non-Debianers... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentica... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication... Bruce Momjian