BTW, while digging through my mail archives I discovered that Oliver *did* already extract his "peer" auth patch and submit it as a proposed patch --- see the pghackers archives for 3-May-2001. At the time I think we were concerned about portability issues, but as long as it's appropriately autoconf'd and documented, I see no real objection to supporting SO_PEERCRED authentication. I do still like Helge's API (use "ident") better than adding another auth keyword, though. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentica... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication... Bruce Momjian