Fujii Masao escribió: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dickson S. Guedes escribió: > >> Fujii Masao escreveu: > >>> (...) > >>>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use another > >>>> name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an internal module name > >>>> but it should be a feature name (ex. 'replication'). > >>>> > >>> > >>> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think. > >>> Any other ideas? > >> > >> 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. Other > >> modules, in replication feature, could be placed there too. > > > > Hmm, what is this database there for? > > It's for authentication for replication. This was discussed before. > Please see the following thread and feel free to comment. > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00187.php
Hmm ... I think this means that the suggestion by Dickson does not make much sense, right? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers