On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:23:45PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Fujii Masao escribió: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dickson S. Guedes escribió: > > >> Fujii Masao escreveu: > > >>> (...) > > >>>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use > > >>>> another name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an > > >>>> internal module name but it should be a feature name (ex. > > >>>> 'replication'). > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think. > > >>> Any other ideas? > > >> > > >> 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. > > >> Other modules, in replication feature, could be placed there > > >> too. > > > > > > Hmm, what is this database there for? > > > > It's for authentication for replication. This was discussed > > before. Please see the following thread and feel free to comment. > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00187.php > > Hmm ... I think this means that the suggestion by Dickson does not > make much sense, right?
It sounds to me like this should use SQL/MED connections, if it's holding auth information :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers