On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 12:40 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> >>> Again, "\dfS" would be a bit useless, unless we say that the implicit > >>> U modifier for no pattern doesn't override an explicit S modifier. > >>> > >>> Comments? Does this cover all the cases? > >> > >> So would "\df" then be equivalent to "\dU"? Or am I misunderstanding > >> something? > > > \df would act as it does now. Showing you *everything*. > > Which part of the quoted paragraph didn't you read? Apparently at least part. Sorry for the noise. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
