Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> I feel pretty strongly that making the pattern search against a
> different list of stuff than what the same command would display
> without the pattern is confusing and a bad idea. It's a bad idea
> regardless of which particular backslash-sequence we're talking about.
Well, I'm perfectly happy to drop that stipulation and just go with
\df -- all
\dfS -- system only
\dfU -- non-system only
but are we willing to change \d and \dt to work that way too?
Or should we leave them inconsistent?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
