On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> I feel pretty strongly that making the pattern search against a >> different list of stuff than what the same command would display >> without the pattern is confusing and a bad idea. It's a bad idea >> regardless of which particular backslash-sequence we're talking about. > > Well, I'm perfectly happy to drop that stipulation and just go with > > \df -- all > \dfS -- system only > \dfU -- non-system only > > but are we willing to change \d and \dt to work that way too? > Or should we leave them inconsistent?
I think you should make: \df - non-system only \dfS - system only \dfA - all Then you could make \dt the same way, and it wouldn't involve breaking the way \dt works now. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
