>>> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Comments? Does this cover all the cases? I tend to think that changing which schemas are searched based on the presence or absence of a search pattern is a bad idea. Is the bare form (no U or S) going to search all schemas or the ones on the search path? Whatever the answer, do we need a way to get the other? +1 for consistency across all \d commands, even though I almost always want to see just the user objects. IMO it's worth the extra keystroke to be sure of what I'm seeing. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
