On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> All, >> >> > In any case, the release notes aren't normally a bottleneck. I still >> > think that Bruce had his priorities out of whack in not cleaning up >> > his open-items list before doing this. If he had done so, nobody >> > would have noticed how long the notes took. >> >> Yes, although Bruce *has* asked for help in cleaning up the open-items list. > > Uh, not now; I put up the list only so people wouldn't think I was > hiding things, and I said it wasn't cleaned up. What is so hard for > people to understand about that. This is quite annoying.
If I understand correctly, you're saying that you didn't want to have help with the release notes, you don't want help cleaning up your mailbox, but you do want beta to wait until you are done doing those things and any resulting action items have been completed. Is that right? I don't think anyone thinks you're hiding anything, but I think there is a general desire to move this thing along as quickly as reasonably possible. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
