Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> All, > >> > >> > In any case, the release notes aren't normally a bottleneck. ?I still > >> > think that Bruce had his priorities out of whack in not cleaning up > >> > his open-items list before doing this. ?If he had done so, nobody > >> > would have noticed how long the notes took. > >> > >> Yes, although Bruce *has* asked for help in cleaning up the open-items > >> list. > > > > Uh, not now; ?I put up the list only so people wouldn't think I was > > hiding things, and I said it wasn't cleaned up. ?What is so hard for > > people to understand about that. ?This is quite annoying. > > If I understand correctly, you're saying that you didn't want to have > help with the release notes, you don't want help cleaning up your > mailbox, but you do want beta to wait until you are done doing those > things and any resulting action items have been completed. Is that > right? > > I don't think anyone thinks you're hiding anything, but I think there > is a general desire to move this thing along as quickly as reasonably > possible.
And to answer your question about the release notes, Tom is right that it probably has to be done by one person because it needs a consistent voice, and someone has to get the entire release notes in their head so they can see logical sections/groupings, etc. Once it is done, as it is now, people can jump in and add improvements. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
