Tom Lane wrote: > Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes: >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Heikki Linnakangas >> <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> Now is the time to decide, before the PostgreSQL beta is out. I understand >>> the pain inflicted on tools, but I don't think that's a good reason to not >>> change it. People using a beta version of pgAdmin will should understand >>> that it's not final yet and there can be small glitches like that. > >> It's not about the changes the users see, it's about invalidating the >> testing that's been done on the tools & interfaces and requiring last >> minute changes to be made followed by re-testing. > > Personally I think the naming decision is close enough to be a coin > toss, and so either choice is fine with me. However, I think it is > Clearly Unacceptable for createdb's switches to be spelled differently > than the underlying SQL command's options. So it's not really "let's > not change this" but "which one do you consider it more important to not > change"?
pgAdmin uses the SQL commands, not the external commands. IIRC the only external commands that are used are pg_dump[all], pg_restore, pg_ctl and initdb. Is initdb on the list of tools that might be changed? //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers