On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Personally I think the naming decision is close enough to be a coin > toss, and so either choice is fine with me. However, I think it is > Clearly Unacceptable for createdb's switches to be spelled differently > than the underlying SQL command's options. So it's not really "let's > not change this" but "which one do you consider it more important to not > change"?
In this case, createdb - however, this particular case is of very minor impact to us. My gripe is more on the general issue of being potentially forced to add support for a new version and beta test tools in the same timeframe that PostgreSQL has for beta. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
