Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Now, what about the idea of providing a shorthand LOCALE='foo', > mirroring --locale=foo initdb option? It seems like a good idea, because > you almost never want to set LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE differently. If we > do that, should LOCALE=foo also imply a per-database lc_messages, > lc_monetary, lc_numeric and lc_time settings? It seems like it should > for the sake of consistency.
The comment upthread was that we can/should leave that for 8.5. I agree with that at this point. I think the above proposal is not as straightforward as it looks (in particular per-DB lc_messages has unpleasant implications for the postmaster log) and we should not tackle it in a hasty manner. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers