Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > >>> Here is my thinking, and considering that that would basically involve a > >>> forward-looking design decision right now, I would support dropping the > >>> cardinality() function from 8.4 (if people agree that this is in fact the > >>> design decision to make). > >> > >> At this point I'd support that too. > > > +1 > > Since there were no objections, and there is no time left before beta1, > I'm going to go ahead and remove cardinality().
Do we want a TODO? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
