David Fetter wrote:
> Is this any better?
So what happens if I do \dfaQ? It should throw an error, yes?
This help line:
> + fprintf(output, _(" \\df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions. Add a, n,
> t, w for aggregate, normal, trigger, window\n"));
needs shortening to below 80 chars (or maybe split it in two lines.
Just make sure they are a single translation item).
It also seems like we're missing tab completion support for this.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
