Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed (!) that Make accepts an argument-less -j option, which > it takes to mean "use as many parallel jobs as possible". As far as I > see in our pg_restore code, we don't even accept an argumentless -j > option; was this deviation from the Make precedent on purpose, or were > we just not following Make at all on this? > > I have to admit that I'm not really sure whether this kind of usage > would be a reasonable thing for pg_restore to support. > > (Even if this was a good idea, I'm not suggesting that it be implemented > for 8.4. But if it is, then maybe it deserves a TODO entry.)
An unlimited pg_restore -j seems pretty scary. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
