* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Yeah. Even if Make has a sane way to estimate how many jobs it should > use, I'm not sure that pg_restore does. (The most obvious heuristic > for Make is to try to find out how many CPUs there are --- but at > least it's running on the same machine it's going to be eating CPU > on. pg_restore can't assume that.)
I'm not sure if I'd consider it 'sane', but make basically uses the
dependency information, if a job can be run based on its dependency
requirements, then it's started. For small projects, this isn't
necessairly terrible, but it's not something I would generally
recommend.
I don't see any reasonable implementation, or justification, for
supporting something like that in pg_restore.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
