Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I just noticed (!) that Make accepts an argument-less -j option, which
>> it takes to mean "use as many parallel jobs as possible".
> An unlimited pg_restore -j seems pretty scary.
Yeah. Even if Make has a sane way to estimate how many jobs it should
use, I'm not sure that pg_restore does. (The most obvious heuristic
for Make is to try to find out how many CPUs there are --- but at
least it's running on the same machine it's going to be eating CPU
on. pg_restore can't assume that.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
