On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 17:42 -0300, Dickson S. Guedes wrote: > Em Qua, 2009-05-06 às 16:27 -0400, Tom Lane escreveu: > > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > > I think it would be better that the schema is specified on the command > > > line. > > > > Surely that's more work than the issue is worth. It's also inconvenient > > to use, because you'd have to remember to give the switch both for the > > -i run and the normal test runs. > > So, in my opinion, the Joshua alternative is a good little change that > let "pgbench" runs in a more flexible way. > > But, there is the possibility that someone are using an automated script > that could be broken by this change?
Only if the role pgbench is using as an explicit search_path set. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
