On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 09:53 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 12:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Well, pgbench has been coded this way since forever and we've only seen > > this one report of trouble. Still, I can't object very hard to renaming > > the tables to pgbench_accounts etc --- it's a trivial change and the > > only thing it could break is custom pgbench scenarios that rely on the > > default scenario's tables, which there are probably not many of. > > > > So do we have consensus on dropping the "SET search_path" and renaming > > the tables? > > +1 (I hate prefixed table names but I get the idea)
+1, sorry JD. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
