"Joshua D. Drake" <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 17:42 -0300, Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
>> But, there is the possibility that someone are using an automated script
>> that could be broken by this change?
> Only if the role pgbench is using as an explicit search_path set.
Even then, it's not a problem from the point of view of pgbench ---
the tables will still get created and used correctly. The only problem
shows up if someone is ignoring the existing warning in the docs and
running pgbench in a database that has application tables named accounts
&etc. If you're doing that you're at considerable risk anyway, no
matter *what* we do or don't do with pgbench's search path.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
