Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Let me start this out by voting the things I think we can drop until 8.5:
> * gettext plurals patch needs some polishing
> -- revert patch, save for 8.5
Peter might think differently about that ;-). My problem with it is
that we don't seem to have a polished API for how code uses the feature.
I wouldn't mind so much except that once we release we are going to be
stuck with the API indefinitely --- the usage will propagate into
third-party code very quickly and we won't want to break that code by
changing it.
Personally I'd prefer to fix it rather than revert it.
> # adjust information_schema precision and scale fields?
> -- save for 8.5
No objection here. I mainly wanted to make sure the issue doesn't get
forgotten.
> # instrument the Windows shared memory reattachment problem?
> -- as much as I'd like to do this, the solution could be as bad as the
> problem; we'd need more testing time for new instrumentation. Will have
> to deal with via testing patched versions.
Yeah. That was put on the list a month ago, when there was still plenty
of time to do something about it; but since we missed getting it into
beta2 I think it will have to wait.
> # tweak the ordering heuristics for parallel pg_restore?
> -- beta2 version is "good enough"; further improvements should be saved
> for 8.5.
OK, particularly if no one is in a position to test it right away.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
