Kris Jurka <bo...@ejurka.com> writes:
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Robert Haas wrote:
>> tgl says: whether or not we think PL/Java is bulletproof, there are
>> other problems, for instance this one
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/87zlnwnvjg....@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
>>
>> That's a pretty overwhelming argument for leaving it as-is. I think
>> we should remove this from the list of open items.
> Yes, that makes sense to me as the original requester of this open item.
> I thought it had been taken off a while ago.
Removed now.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
