On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Robert Haas wrote:

Regarding this item:

* Consider reverting preventing regular users from base type creation

You raise this point:

tgl says: whether or not we think PL/Java is bulletproof, there are
other problems, for instance this one
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/87zlnwnvjg....@news-spur.riddles.org.uk

That's a pretty overwhelming argument for leaving it as-is.  I think
we should remove this from the list of open items.

Yes, that makes sense to me as the original requester of this open item. I thought it had been taken off a while ago.

Kris Jurka

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to