Tom Lane wrote:
"David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes:
Yeah, with git, rather than cd'ing to another directory, you'd just do `git checkout rel8_3` and work from the same directory.

That's what I'd gathered, and frankly it is not an acceptable answer.
Sure, the "checkout" operation is remarkably fast, but it does nothing
for derived files.  What would really be involved here (if I wanted to
be sure of having a non-broken build) is
        make maintainer-clean
        git checkout rel8_3
        configure
        make
which takes long enough that I'll have plenty of time to consider
how much I hate git.  If there isn't a better way proposed, I'm
going to flip back to voting against this conversion.  I need tools
that work for me not against me.

        
        

Hmm. I confess that I never switch between CVS branches. Instead I keep a separate tree for each maintained branch. And that's what the buildfarm does and will continue doing with git. Maybe that's not as efficient a way for a developer to work, I don't know.

Of course, your work rate gives you much more weight in this discussion than me ;-)

cheers

andrew

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to