Fujii Masao wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Magnus Hagander<mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> Is there any reason not to remove the include directory in PG_CPPFLAGS >> as well? Seems it is equally unused... > > No. I agree to remove PG_CPPFLAGS.
The second question is, is it worth doing this so extremely late in the 8.4 development? After mentioning it quickly in an offlist discussion with Heikki, I think our conclusion was that we should wait with this until the tree opens for 8.5. It's not a very likely scenario that anybody actually has pg_standby on a machine that doesn't have libpq on it - since it needs to have a PostgreSQL server on it to make any sense.... -- Magnus Hagander Self: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
