Magnus Hagander wrote: > Fujii Masao wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Magnus Hagander<mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >>> Is there any reason not to remove the include directory in PG_CPPFLAGS >>> as well? Seems it is equally unused... >> No. I agree to remove PG_CPPFLAGS. > > The second question is, is it worth doing this so extremely late in the > 8.4 development? After mentioning it quickly in an offlist discussion > with Heikki, I think our conclusion was that we should wait with this > until the tree opens for 8.5. It's not a very likely scenario that > anybody actually has pg_standby on a machine that doesn't have libpq on > it - since it needs to have a PostgreSQL server on it to make any sense....
Right, let's put this on the first 8.5 commitfest page. It's not a regression and it's harmless in practice. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
