Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> The second question is, is it worth doing this so extremely late in the >> 8.4 development? After mentioning it quickly in an offlist discussion >> with Heikki, I think our conclusion was that we should wait with this >> until the tree opens for 8.5. > > +1. This is barely even a bug; it's not worth taking any risk for at > this point. (It is already too late for a patch applied now to be > tested by the whole buildfarm before we wrap 8.4.0 --- some machines > are on a once-a-day cycle.)
Yeah, that was our reasoning as well. Attached is a patch that takes them both away, so I have something to put on the wiki :-) -- Magnus Hagander Self: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pg_standby/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -c -r1.4 Makefile *** Makefile 10 Nov 2007 23:59:51 -0000 1.4 --- Makefile 25 Jun 2009 13:32:08 -0000 *************** *** 3,11 **** PROGRAM = pg_standby OBJS = pg_standby.o - PG_CPPFLAGS = -I$(libpq_srcdir) - PG_LIBS = $(libpq_pgport) - ifdef USE_PGXS PG_CONFIG = pg_config PGXS := $(shell $(PG_CONFIG) --pgxs) --- 3,8 ----
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
