On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > There is definitely not enough evidence here to justify breaking > existing applications, which is what introducing => would do. > When and if there's a ratified standard using =>, it'll be time > to break stuff. In the meantime we can do something with AS and > be reasonably certain we haven't painted ourselves into a corner.
I wasn't proposing introducing => ; I thought we might want to hold off on doing anything at all. But I may be the only one, so never mind. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
