Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Now that I've started to read this patch ... exactly what is the >> argument for allowing a "mixed" notation (some of the parameters >> named and some not)? ISTM that just serves to complicate both the >> patch and the user's-eye view, for no real benefit. > > Wow, I can't imagine not supporting that. Doesn't every language > that supports anything like named parameters also support a mix? Sybase ASE and Microsoft SQL Server support mixed notation (and I think that goes back to their common version 1.0). If a parameter is specified more than once, it is an error. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
