Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> Tom Lane escribió:
>> Um, sorry, no reason to do which?
> No reason not to leave prototypes alone in the AWK code. Isn't the
> style emitted by indent good enough already? The comment that ctags
> needs it is probably outdated (I know my ctags, the Exuberant one,
> doesn't).
Personally I quite like the fact that the function definition is the
only place where the function name appears left-justified. Modern ctags
might or might not care, but there are all sorts of code search tools
out there and we should not presume which ones developers are using.
I vote against changing it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
