On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: >> Tom Lane escribió: >>> Um, sorry, no reason to do which? > >> No reason not to leave prototypes alone in the AWK code. Isn't the >> style emitted by indent good enough already? The comment that ctags >> needs it is probably outdated (I know my ctags, the Exuberant one, >> doesn't). > > Personally I quite like the fact that the function definition is the > only place where the function name appears left-justified. Modern ctags > might or might not care, but there are all sorts of code search tools > out there and we should not presume which ones developers are using. > I vote against changing it.
+1000. I use git grep '^function_name' constantly. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
