Robert Haas escribió: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Ah. That's a bit idiosyncratic to pgindent. What it does for a > > function definition makes sense, I think: it lines up all the > > parameters to start in the same column: > That is truly bizarre. +1 from me for doing something that a > competent C programmer can figure out without a calculator. I don't > care what the rule is particularly, as long as it's obvious how to > follow it. (In my own code I indent all of my continuation lines by > one additional 4-space tab-stop. I realize this would be a horrible > idea for PG since we don't want to change anything that's going to > reindent the entire code base, and you might all hate it for other > reasons anyway, but the point is that any idiot can look at it and > figure out how it's supposed to be indented, because the rule is > simple.) Well, the rule here is simple too (set cinoptions=(0 if you're Vim-enabled). It's only function prototypes that are a bit weird, and once you understand how it works it's trivial to reproduce. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers