Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> An easy fix for that is to allow this form of COPY to return text[] >> instead of a fixed number of text columns.
> I'd like to see some concrete syntax suggestions for such an animal. I think there were some in the previous discussion --- it came down to using a SRF with arguments that specify the copy source and options. Setting the result type as text[] instead of some has-to-be-specified composite type should actually make it a bit easier. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers