"Greg Sabino Mullane" <g...@turnstep.com> writes:
>> We also very occasionally step in and make a decision if -hackers (or
>> another group) is deadlocked over an issue. For example, the whole   
>> 'change the name' debate.

> I wouldn't really hold that up as a shining example of a core decision. :)

The point of core's action then was to put a stop to an unproductive
flamewar.  Which it did.  Could we please not restart that?

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to