On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 15:19 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > I can't help but wonder if the PERIOD type might be better for > representing a partition range. It would make it easier to express and > enforce the constraint that no two partition ranges overlap ;)
I can't help but wonder if the period type might better be a generic container for pairs of scalar, totally-ordered types. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
