On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:03 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I can't help but wonder if the period type might better be a generic
> container for pairs of scalar, totally-ordered types.
That would be ideal. However, it doesn't really look like our type
system was built to handle that kind of thing.
We could use typmod, I suppose, but even that won't hold a full Oid. Any
ideas/suggestions?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
