Jeff Davis wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:03 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I can't help but wonder if the period type might better be a generic >> container for pairs of scalar, totally-ordered types. > > That would be ideal. However, it doesn't really look like our type > system was built to handle that kind of thing. > > We could use typmod, I suppose, but even that won't hold a full Oid. Any > ideas/suggestions?
Wait, it doesn't? A typmod is a 32-bit integer, like Oids. Am I missing something? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
